I have came across this online, and I found it so funny. Apparently it is the CEO of JP Morgan who is giving advice to girls who are seeking to marry rich men, from a "business man's" point of view.
"A young and pretty lady posted this on a popular forum:
Title: What should I do to marry a rich guy?
I'm going to be honest of what I'm going to say here. I'm 25 this year. I'm very pretty, have style and good taste. I wish to marry a guy with $500...k annual salary or above. You might say that I'm greedy, but an annual salary of $1M is considered only as middle class in New York. My requirement is not high. Is there anyone in this forum who has an income of $500k annual salary? Are you all married?
I wanted to ask: what should I do to marry rich persons like you? Among those I've dated, the richest is $250k annual income, and it seems that this is my upper limit. If someone is going to move into high cost residential area on the west of New York City Garden(?), $250k annual income is not enough. I'm here humbly to ask a few questions:
1) Where do most rich bachelors hang out? (Please list down the names and addresses of bars, restaurant, gym)
2) Which age group should I target?
3) Why most wives of the riches are only average-looking? I've met a few girls who don't have looks and are not interesting, but they are able to marry rich guys.
4) How do you decide who can be your wife, and who can only be your girlfriend? (my target now is to get married)"
Ms. Pretty
A philosophical reply from CEO of J.P. Morgan:
Dear Ms. Pretty,
I have read your post with great interest. Guess there are lots of girls out there who have similar questions like yours. Please allow me to analyse your situation as a professional investor. My annual income is more than $500k, which meets your requirement, so I hope everyone believes that I'm not wasting time here.
From the standpoint of a business person, it is a bad decision to marry you. The answer is very simple, so let me explain.
Put the details aside, what you're trying to do is an exchange of "beauty" and "money" : Person A provides beauty, and Person B pays for it, fair and square. However, there's a deadly problem here, your beauty will fade, but my money will not be gone without any good reason. The fact is, my income might increase from year to year, but you can't be prettier year after year. Hence from the viewpoint of economics, I am an appreciation asset, and you are a depreciation asset. It's not just normal depreciation, but exponential depreciation. If that is your only asset, your value will be much worse 10 years later.
By the terms we use in Wall Street, every trading has a position, dating with you is also a "trading position". If the trade value dropped we will sell it and it is not a good idea to keep it for long term - same goes with the marriage that you wanted. It might be cruel to say this, but in order to make a wiser decision any assets with great depreciation value will be sold or "leased". Anyone with over $500k annual income is not a fool; we would only date you, but will not marry you. I would advice that you forget looking for any clues to marry a rich guy. And by the way, you could make yourself to become a rich person with $500k annual income. This has better chance than finding a rich fool. Hope this reply helps.
If you are interested in "leasing" services, do contact me. signed, J.P. Morgan CEO
Showing posts with label Random. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Random. Show all posts
Saturday, 4 June 2011
Tuesday, 11 May 2010
My other blog
Here is my other blog, called one night one dream.I will be telling about dreams that happens when I'm asleep.
http://simpledreamzz.blogspot.com/
http://simpledreamzz.blogspot.com/
Tuesday, 13 April 2010
Untitled
A poem I wrote a long time ago,and that I just found again, not too bad, when I think back.
A Smile on your opposite,
Not fond about it,
Being betrayed by you,
So poor
Lost under the surface,
Feeling so faithless,
Seeing you there,
Unaware
A stab in the left place,
Once been where the red feel en laced,
Melting like the snow,
Away I blow
In a populated desert,
Alone I prepare,
The end of light,
Goodbye
A Smile on your opposite,
Not fond about it,
Being betrayed by you,
So poor
Lost under the surface,
Feeling so faithless,
Seeing you there,
Unaware
A stab in the left place,
Once been where the red feel en laced,
Melting like the snow,
Away I blow
In a populated desert,
Alone I prepare,
The end of light,
Goodbye
Wednesday, 24 February 2010
Mars or Human's insanity
Today I was reading an article about a project to go to our beloved neighbour planet called Mars, also known as "Red Planet". It was explaining about how they wanted to go there and makes experiments to know more about different aspects of science. But one point that catches my attention, it was when they were explaining how feasible it was to populate and live on Mars.
I was thinking that might be a great idea to do but why would we want to go to a place where there is no oxygen, where the temperatures are really extremes and where there is nothing there, apart two robots we've sent and perhaps little green men =_=;;;
The idea I am against was we want to go there because we know that our Earth wont last forever and that life would be hard on our home planet, because I am totally for making new experiments and getting forward in science. But if it is to go for the survival of our species then it would be just a mess.
Now suppose it is the end of the world, the last day of our life because of black holes, or the earth is too hot, not enough food or whatever. Everybody would want to get on a spacecraft and go to Mars. But unfortunately not everybody can. Then who will go there, certainly not the poor people or the sick ones. Maybe it would be like when a ship shrinks :"Women and children first", but I doubt so. Then who?? The rich and famous people, maybe they could pay whoever owns the spaceship, but money would have no value at that moment. It would actually be quite fun to see the desperation of the rich people to go there, since money would have no value. Politics might use their power to go but the people who own the spaceships could be greedy and not accept anyone apart their relatives. How about animals? How would we eat on Mars without animals or plants. I was thinking of taking only the chicken, since they can lay one egg everyday. Or maybe we could take the DNA of all animals and recreate them once on Mars. All in all that would be just a mess. What I will do if it is the end of the world, would be stay with my beloved ones and try to live as happy as we can our last day.
Therefore I still think it would be better try to save our own planet. We want to go in the middle of nowhere while we are already somewhere. There are so much problems on Earth that still can be solved such as global warming, conservation of species, unemployment, poverty, famine etc...
There are so much to do and so much we can do to make life better here. It is too easy if we want to escape all these, because in the end we would recreate the same problems that we have done here. Spending big money to do this, while we could do so much more and better things with it to help our people. Better try to save our present and what still can be saved, than thinking already about the end of the world.
Laters.
I was thinking that might be a great idea to do but why would we want to go to a place where there is no oxygen, where the temperatures are really extremes and where there is nothing there, apart two robots we've sent and perhaps little green men =_=;;;
The idea I am against was we want to go there because we know that our Earth wont last forever and that life would be hard on our home planet, because I am totally for making new experiments and getting forward in science. But if it is to go for the survival of our species then it would be just a mess.
Now suppose it is the end of the world, the last day of our life because of black holes, or the earth is too hot, not enough food or whatever. Everybody would want to get on a spacecraft and go to Mars. But unfortunately not everybody can. Then who will go there, certainly not the poor people or the sick ones. Maybe it would be like when a ship shrinks :"Women and children first", but I doubt so. Then who?? The rich and famous people, maybe they could pay whoever owns the spaceship, but money would have no value at that moment. It would actually be quite fun to see the desperation of the rich people to go there, since money would have no value. Politics might use their power to go but the people who own the spaceships could be greedy and not accept anyone apart their relatives. How about animals? How would we eat on Mars without animals or plants. I was thinking of taking only the chicken, since they can lay one egg everyday. Or maybe we could take the DNA of all animals and recreate them once on Mars. All in all that would be just a mess. What I will do if it is the end of the world, would be stay with my beloved ones and try to live as happy as we can our last day.
Therefore I still think it would be better try to save our own planet. We want to go in the middle of nowhere while we are already somewhere. There are so much problems on Earth that still can be solved such as global warming, conservation of species, unemployment, poverty, famine etc...
There are so much to do and so much we can do to make life better here. It is too easy if we want to escape all these, because in the end we would recreate the same problems that we have done here. Spending big money to do this, while we could do so much more and better things with it to help our people. Better try to save our present and what still can be saved, than thinking already about the end of the world.
Laters.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)